While I agree with the government’s goal to prevent asylum seekers from embarking on perilous journeys to the UK, I am skeptical about the effectiveness of their recent asylum and returns strategy.
Certain aspects of the plan have my support, such as community sponsorship, which allows individuals to embrace refugees into their localities. Naturally, individuals without the right to remain in the UK should be promptly deported.
My concerns lie with how the proposals could impact those with valid asylum claims, particularly those fleeing conflict and persecution, as well as refugee children who enter the country through irregular means, often due to family ties or being born to refugee parents here.
The government’s suggestion to reassess an individual’s asylum status every 30 months for up to two decades could divide communities. It may create a disparity between those who can confidently establish roots and those who are left in a state of uncertainty.
There is a risk that the proposed immigration policies, which could generate hostility, will lead communities to view certain individuals as temporary guests. This situation is particularly stark for children. Are we implying that even children born and raised in the UK must accept the possibility of being uprooted and sent back to a place they have never known if the government deems their original country safe?
The government defends these measures by stating they will reduce “pull factors.” However, this assertion assumes that asylum seekers are well-informed about the destination country’s policies. In reality, most asylum seekers are unaware of the asylum policies, rights, or benefits in their target countries. In the UK, factors such as having family connections, language proficiency, and established diaspora communities play a more significant role in an asylum seeker’s decision.
To combat the exploitation of vulnerable individuals by human traffickers, collaboration with neighboring countries is crucial.
During the final months of the Biden administration, a strategy combining border controls at the US Southern border, returns to Mexico, and access to legal pathways resulted in an 81% decrease in irregular border crossings.
The UK government could enhance cooperation with EU partners, such as expanding the UK-France one-in-one-out initiative inspired by the successful Biden policy to other EU nations. This approach would involve the UK increasing the intake of asylum seekers from Europe while facilitating an equivalent number of returns.
Furthermore, the UK could trial the use of asylum centers in France as an initial step in evaluating a refugee’s eligibility for asylum. However, the UK should avoid piloting harsh and inhumane measures.
At Reach and across our entities we and our partners use information collected through cookies and other identifiers from your device to improve experience on our site, analyse how it is used and to show personalised advertising. You can opt out of the sale or sharing of your data, at any time clicking the “Do Not Sell or Share my Data” button at the bottom of the webpage. Please note that your preferences are browser specific. Use of our website